🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization established by the family of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the local level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to follow this example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.